|
Pfizer admits that the Cox-2 drug Bextra is linked to heart problems
By: Michael Monheit, Esquire, Monheit Law, PC
Pfizer admits that the Cox-2 drug Bextra is linked to heart problems
Clinical trials showed heart bypass surgery patients taking Bextra, an anti-inflammatory in the same class as the recently withdrawn drug Vioxx, had a higher risk of stroke and heart attack.
It was already known that Bextra can cause a rare, but sometimes fatal, skin disorder called Stevens-Johnson syndrome to note that cases of the condition are being seen more often with Bextra than with other drugs in the same class. Warnings about this have been recently updated.
Bextra is approved to treat pain from arthritis and, like Merck & Co.'s Vioxx, is a COX-2 inhibitor. A recent trial showed Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke in arthritis patients who took the drug for more than 18 months. This is significant because these patients are already at risk of stroke or heart attack. So a drug like Bextra could be very dangerous if Bextra increases and already higher than normal risk of stroke or heart attack.
The Vioxx withdrawal has cast a cloud over the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, which includes Bextra, Celebrex and an experimental drug from Novartis AG called Prexige.
However, Pfizer said that following the Vioxx withdrawal it re-examined its clinical data base of 8,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and found no increased risk of dangerous heart events in patients taking Bextra for up to a year. The company also found no increased risk in a trial of patients taking Bextra in a general surgery setting. Of course, check the source, as Cox-2 drugs like Bextra account for $6 billion in sales per year!
Doctors said it is too early to quantify the potential risk of Bextra or of Pfizer's other COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex as neither have tested for long enough. Pfizer said it is conducting longer term trials in arthritis patients.
The coronary bypass trials are ones that Dr. Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and an early and outspoken critic of Vioxx, said he finds concerning as they show a cluster of heart attacks and strokes. But he said the danger signal does not appear to be as strong as it was with Vioxx.
"Celebrex and Bextra do appear safer than Vioxx but whether they are really safe, especially in patients with heart risk, that's an open question," Topol said.
Pfizer has updated the label on several occasions since it was approved in 2001 to reflect the risk of Stevens Johnson syndrome, a form of allergic reaction often caused by certain types of drug. Symptoms usually begin as a blistering of the mouth and lips, spreading to the throat, tongue and other parts of the body. The blisters sometimes become so extensive as to be fatal. The company also updated its warning that Bextra can cause a rare, but sometimes fatal, skin disorder called Stevens-Johnson syndrome to note that cases of the condition are being seen more often with Bextra than with other drugs in the same class. Now the label should be updated to include information on stroke and heart attack risks from Bextra.
Bextra is approved to treat pain from arthritis and, like Merck & Co.'s Vioxx, is a COX-2 inhibitor. A recent trial showed Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke in arthritis patients who took the drug for more than 18 months.
The Vioxx withdrawal has cast a cloud over the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, which includes Bextra, Celebrex and an experimental drug from Novartis AG called Prexige.
However, Pfizer said that following the Vioxx withdrawal it re-examined its clinical data base of 8,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and found no increased risk of dangerous heart events in patients taking Bextra for up to a year. The company also found no increased risk in a trial of patients taking Bextra in a general surgery setting. Again, check the source.
Doctors said it is too early to quantify the potential risk of Bextra or of Pfizer's other COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex as neither have tested for long enough. Pfizer said it is conducting longer term trials in arthritis patients.
The coronary bypass trials are ones that Dr. Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and an early and outspoken critic of Vioxx, said he finds concerning as they show a cluster of heart attacks and strokes. But he said the danger signal does not appear to be as strong as it was with Vioxx.
"Celebrex and Bextra do appear safer than Vioxx but whether they are really safe, especially in patients with heart risk, that's an open question," Topol said.
Pfizer has updated the label on several occasions since it was approved in 2001 to reflect the risk of Stevens Johnson syndrome, a form of allergic reaction often caused by certain types of drug. Symptoms usually begin as a blistering of the mouth and lips, spreading to the throat, tongue and other parts of the body. The blisters sometimes become so extensive as to be fatal. The company also updated its warning that Bextra can cause a rare, but sometimes fatal, skin disorder called Stevens-Johnson syndrome to note that cases of the condition are being seen more often with Bextra than with other drugs in the same class.
Bextra is approved to treat pain from arthritis and, like Merck & Co.'s Vioxx, is a COX-2 inhibitor. A recent trial showed Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke in arthritis patients who took the drug for more than 18 months.
The Vioxx withdrawal has cast a cloud over the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, which includes Bextra, Celebrex and an experimental drug from Novartis AG called Prexige.
However, Pfizer said that following the Vioxx withdrawal it re-examined its clinical data base of 8,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and found no increased risk of dangerous heart events in patients taking Bextra for up to a year. The company also found no increased risk in a trial of patients taking Bextra in a general surgery setting.
Doctors said it is too early to quantify the potential risk of Bextra or of Pfizer's other COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex as neither have tested for long enough. Pfizer said it is conducting longer term trials in arthritis patients.
The coronary bypass trials are ones that Dr. Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and an early and outspoken critic of Vioxx, said he finds concerning as they show a cluster of heart attacks and strokes. But he said the danger signal does not appear to be as strong as it was with Vioxx.
"Celebrex and Bextra do appear safer than Vioxx but whether they are really safe, especially in patients with heart risk, that's an open question," Topol said.
Pfizer has updated the label on several occasions since it was approved in 2001 to reflect the risk of Stevens Johnson syndrome, a form of allergic reaction often caused by certain types of drug. Symptoms usually begin as a blistering of the mouth and lips, spreading to the throat, tongue and other parts of the body. The blisters sometimes become so extensive as to be fatal. The company also updated its warning that Bextra can cause a rare, but sometimes fatal, skin disorder called Stevens-Johnson syndrome to note that cases of the condition are being seen more often with Bextra than with other drugs in the same class.
Bextra is approved to treat pain from arthritis and, like Merck & Co.'s Vioxx, is a COX-2 inhibitor. A recent trial showed Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke in arthritis patients who took the drug for more than 18 months.
The Vioxx withdrawal has cast a cloud over the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, which includes Bextra, Celebrex and an experimental drug from Novartis AG called Prexige.
However, Pfizer said that following the Vioxx withdrawal it re-examined its clinical data base of 8,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and found no increased risk of dangerous heart events in patients taking Bextra for up to a year. The company also found no increased risk in a trial of patients taking Bextra in a general surgery setting.
Doctors said it is too early to quantify the potential risk of Bextra or of Pfizer's other COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex as neither have tested for long enough. Pfizer said it is conducting longer term trials in arthritis patients.
The coronary bypass trials are ones that Dr. Eric Topol of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and an early and outspoken critic of Vioxx, said he finds concerning as they show a cluster of heart attacks and strokes. But he said the danger signal does not appear to be as strong as it was with Vioxx.
"Celebrex and Bextra do appear safer than Vioxx but whether they are really safe, especially in patients with heart risk, that's an open question," Topol said.
Pfizer has updated the label on several occasions since it was approved in 2001 to reflect the risk of Stevens Johnson syndrome, a form of allergic reaction often caused by certain types of drug. Symptoms usually begin as a blistering of the mouth and lips, spreading to the throat, tongue and other parts of the body. The blisters sometimes become so extensive as to be fatal.
About the Author
Michael Monheit, Esquire is the managing attorney for Monheit Law, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Monheit Law, P.C. concentrates its practice in the field of plaintiff personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis. They can be found at Monheit Law
Return to Index
email this
page
Still haven't found what you are
looking for?
Try this search:
Free Email
List Reveals health,
fitness and wellness
tips - secrets and information - delivered directly to
your inbox
How to Benefit from the Mind-Body Connection
(excerpt)
You are about to gain insight into the
mind-body connection. The number of
people who truly understand these principles on our
planet are relatively few.
There is an undeniable connection between our minds and
bodies, you can learn
to use this fact to your benefit.
Dr. Bernie Siegel, author of "Love, Medicine and
Miracles" was once a
distraught cancer surgeon until he
began to understand the greater principles
of the mind-
body connection. He felt dragged down by the artificial
barriers
that existed between patient and doctor, and the
helplessness he often felt as
a result of his inability
to effectively serve those patients. Eventually, those
barriers
were disintegrated by Dr. Siegel's recognition
and growing understanding of the
mind-body connection and
how it could serve his patients and himself.
Dr. Siegel, or Bernie as he began to have his patients
refer to him, had some
startling realizations as a cancer surgeon. He found that
there were actually
quite a few people in the world that successfully beat
the statistics on cancer
survival. He began to recognize that a patient's ability
to defeat something as
serious as cancer had to do with the patient's mind and
attitude about their
disease.
If you would like to see the rest of
this article, please go here:
http://www.tobeinformed.com/repository/mind-body.html
copyright 2004 - David Snape
|
|